So, I was looking at
[link]
A very very good painting, btw. Not my most favorite of subjects but that's what happens when you work in a bookstore for a HP release.
Moving on.
I was reading her description
"It makes me sad when people say that anime artists can't draw realism ;<
Seems like discrimination to me..."
So I loved that I read comments like "YEAH that's SO not fair I can draw good realism AND good anime and I get nagged at all the time!!!!111". Or "YEAH -insert someone's name or profession- just ASSUMED all I draw is anime! UGH I hate that!"
So what is in type 1's gallery?
-Crappy anime
-No realism, nor anything resembling an attempt
In type 2's?
-Slightly better anime, but nothing that would ever get you anywhere.
-Actually, NOTHING other than anime.
"I hate how elitist the fine arts world can be"
Well maybe if you all shutup and backed up what you were saying, the fine artists would leave you alone.
Do you think Picasso would have been as accepted as he had been if he had not been able to show he had an understanding of realism? Did you think he just spit out cubist psychotic paintings and was a hit?
Uhm...no.
Of course there are anime artists who can draw realism. And you can tell who they are because they (almost always) draw good anime. Why do they draw good anime? Because in order to draw anything that stylized you have to have an understanding of how things are in reality. (Unless you're me who just can't draw anime at all despite having a decent understanding of realism). Otherwise everything just looks plain screwed up.
People are so dumb.